Friday, March 15, 2013
Is Winter Over?
This has been my first complete Winter spent here in Paducah. Hopefully the temperatures will stay above freezing, and with workable temps in the day time I'll be able to resume creating some art! I should have a post in a month or so showing some new paintings.
Sunday, December 30, 2012
Recent Work
I thought that I better post something in for December, even though I've been busy (maybe not as busy as some are during the holiday season!). Here are a few examples of pieces I've been developing over the past 3 months. I'll be including some of those in my MFA portfolio submission during the end of next month.
These are all part of my Excavation Series (digging through the layers of material to discover "artifacts").
These are all part of my Excavation Series (digging through the layers of material to discover "artifacts").
Monday, August 27, 2012
Fearfully and Wonderfully Made.
I've been reading some articles by Werner Gitt (http://creation.com/dr-werner-gitt) on the topic of Creation/Evolution and followed up on a little research of my own with regard to the human DNA molecule:
The DNA contained within a single human body cell, if stretched out end-to-end, measures about 6 feet. There are between 50 and 100 trillion cells in a human body (depending on age and size). Given 5280 feet/mile, that means that there are between 56.82 and 113 billion miles of DNA in a human being. Given the distance from the earth to the sun to be 93 million miles, that total DNA contained within one human body could make between 300 and 600 trips to the sun and back! Yet, that same DNA mass could be compressed and fill the space of a single ice cube.
(Wikipedia and the book, "Fearfully and Wonderfully made")
Oh, Dr. Gitt's principle point is that a non-material entity (in particular, "information"...our DNA) cannot be generated by a material entity.
The DNA contained within a single human body cell, if stretched out end-to-end, measures about 6 feet. There are between 50 and 100 trillion cells in a human body (depending on age and size). Given 5280 feet/mile, that means that there are between 56.82 and 113 billion miles of DNA in a human being. Given the distance from the earth to the sun to be 93 million miles, that total DNA contained within one human body could make between 300 and 600 trips to the sun and back! Yet, that same DNA mass could be compressed and fill the space of a single ice cube.
(Wikipedia and the book, "Fearfully and Wonderfully made")
Oh, Dr. Gitt's principle point is that a non-material entity (in particular, "information"...our DNA) cannot be generated by a material entity.
Personal Update
Since the beginning of the school year I started teaching Art 100 at WKCTC (the local community college), and will soon be teaching both an after school program (on a monthly basis) in a district about an hour from home and a drawing class for the VCC co-op. This regular employment (along with the part time framing at Michaels) is such an answer to prayer and a much needed provision from the Lord. As a result, the time that I can devote to maintaining this blog will be limited.
I will keep up art production if only for portfolio development. I'll need that when applying for a MFA program at the end of the year. My art festival circuit will be reduced to 5-6 shows a Summer. I will certainly keep posting progress in this art part of my life.
I will keep up art production if only for portfolio development. I'll need that when applying for a MFA program at the end of the year. My art festival circuit will be reduced to 5-6 shows a Summer. I will certainly keep posting progress in this art part of my life.
Tuesday, August 7, 2012
Some Thoughts and Quotes
Ongoing Thoughts on the Context of Art
Say a lot with as little as possible.
Keep the message simple.
Always include a bit of mystery.
Tell a story. People are drawn to storytelling.
It’s okay to be ambiguous or create ambivalence.
The best art comes out of conviction and passion.
Great art is infectious and stands the test of time.
Remain loyal to your passion.
Favorite Quotes on the Subject of Spiritual Guidance
Our activity should,
therefore, consist in placing ourselves in a state of susceptibility to divine
impressions, and pliability to all the operations of the Eternal Word. Whilst
tablet is unsteady, the painter is unable to produce a correct picture upon it,
and every movement of self is productive of erroneous lineaments; it interrupts
the work and defeats the design of this adorable Painter. We must then remain
in peace, and move only when He moves us.
Fenelon,
“Spiritual Progress” 21:5
First
and foremost, to be emptied of self-will, for "even Christ pleased not
Himself" (Rom. 15:3). This is absolutely essential; self-will and
self-pleasing must be mortified if I am to be delivered from walking in
darkness.
As a
general rule it is better for us to trouble our minds very little about
"guidance"--that is God's work: our business is to walk in obedience
to Him day by day.
Divine Guidance, A.W.
Pink
The
will and wisdom of the flesh must be feared and crucified, and denied. The ear
must be closed to all that the flesh and its wisdom, whether in self or in men
around us, has to say. In all our thoughts of God or our study of His Word, in
all our drawings nigh to worship, and all our goings out to work for Him, there
must be a continued distrust and abnegation of self, and a very definite
waiting on God by the Holy Spirit to teach and lead us. A soul that thus daily
and hourly waits for a Divine leading, for the light of knowledge and of duty,
will assuredly receive it. Would you be led of the, Spirit, give up, day by
day, not only your will and wisdom, but your whole life and being. The Fire
will descend and consume the sacrifice.
The Leading of the Spirit, Andrew Murray
The Leading of the Spirit, Andrew Murray
Friday, July 6, 2012
My Thoughts on “Visual Faith”, a book by William Dyrness
I had read this book at some time
in the past and have simply reviewed my notes and re-read the parts
highlighted. It was not a very inspiring book, but did help me to formulate
some questions.
1. Does “Christian art” have to be justified in regard to its
practical value within the Christian community (ie, church banners, educational
aids, worship art, etc.)?
2. Due to popular theology and economic hard times, are we
in an new age of utilitarian art: practical pieces where form follows function
and the colors must match my living room décor?
3. Can God only use “beautiful art” or can it be disturbing
art about judgment or the trials of life?
4. Can art be used to restore passion in the church?
5. Relativistic post-modern culture has attempted to strip
contemporary art of it’s compositional validation (ie, “all art is good” or
“anything goes”). After all, “rules are bad” and we don’t want to hurt anyone’s
self-esteem by criticizing their personal expression. Given this, plus the
evidence of a spiritually bankrupt society, can we conclude that the Christian
artist has before them a great void that only they can fill?
Friday, June 15, 2012
A Review of Wassily Kandinsky's book, "Concerning the Spiritual in Art”
Kandinsky sought his answer through
a conceptual reductionism, which continued the Post–Impressionist’s simplicity
and childlike conveyance of the essence of a thing. However, his goal was to
identify spiritual context and how to convey that energy in art.
He illustrates this aesthetic in
the form of a triangle (or what I would call a “sociology triangle”): the base
of the triangle is the world of government and politics, further up toward the
apex are the sciences, and then at the top are religion and philosophy. Kandinsky
seems to associate advancement up this triangle with the possession of hidden
or exclusive insight. Unfortunately, this understanding reduces the desired
spiritual acquisition to a Gnostic practice: a human or natural attempt to
reach the supernatural through special knowledge.
In particular, he found music to
embody the purity of abstraction and deliberately combined that aspect of
abstraction into the visual art of painting. Kandinsky proposes a compelling
argument: one doesn’t value music because the sounds remind him of or imitate
sounds from nature. So, why should we require that visual art images imitate
the world of nature?
On a personal note, I believe that
music and visual art also run parallel in terms of their audience appreciation.
For example, a culture that is enamored with one-dimensional pop music is not
likely to engage a piece of art with much more than a taste for pablum.
The author refers to both the
“sound of colors”, an undeniable association of instrumental tone and visual
hue, and the “psychic effect” of color. The latter is equally as accepted due
to numerous experiments showing the impact of various colors on the
human psyche. Kandinsky concludes that there must be a link between color and a
corresponding spiritual vibration in the soul.
In the next chapter, the author
analyzes form and color in regard to a “spiritual” vocabulary. He again
emphasizes the advantage that abstract composition has in communicating this
inner vibration. Although there are absolute principles that must apply, the challenge of creating ideal harmony within a composition is that the variable
design elements impose a state of flux on the process; one alteration starts a
chain reaction affecting everything else in that composition.
The inner need of the artist for
spiritual harmony is built on three “mystical” elements: 1) individual
expression (personality), 2) period and societal characteristics
(style), and 3) preservation of the timeless impact of art (pure artistry).
The following two quotes illustrate the application of these elements. “Every artist chooses, from the forms which reflect his own time, those which are sympathetic to him, and expresses himself through them. So the subjective element is the definitive and the external expression of the inner, objective element.” (p. 34).
The following two quotes illustrate the application of these elements. “Every artist chooses, from the forms which reflect his own time, those which are sympathetic to him, and expresses himself through them. So the subjective element is the definitive and the external expression of the inner, objective element.” (p. 34).
“It is impossible to theorize about
this ideal of art. In real art, theory does not precede practice, but follows
her. Everything is, at first, a matter of feeling.” (p. 35)
At this point I must clarify an
ontological distinction between soul and spirit. Kandinsky consistently uses
language associated with the soul level. For him, the deeper things are just
feelings that are hard to put into words. His charts on form and color theory
are helpful, but their application never seems to get beyond the soulish. He
alludes to this shortcoming on page 47, when mentioning the limitation of
simple nerve stimulation, but appears to only see the distinction between mind
and soul (which, in Biblical terms, are in very close association as compared
to the separation between soul and spirit).
The following quote sums up
Kandinsky’s thesis, “Painting is an art, and art is not vague production,
transitory and isolated, but a power which must be directed to the improvement
and refinement of the human soul…to, in fact, the raising of the spiritual
triangle.” (p. 54)
The author admonishes the artist to
take this duty seriously. His talent requires it. And he must understand the
influence he has on the spiritual atmosphere of his greater community.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A personal update: my art production has been put on hold due to a pending living situation. If I'm to remain in my RV and work out of the 8x10 cargo trailer, I'll need to install a portable AC unit (although, I guess that dripping sweat on my art could qualify as part of the mixed media!). Of course, finding a more suitable studio space is a goal.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)